DeprivedDevs/deprived-main-website
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

CSS school text
All checks were successful
Rebuild signaller for deprived.dev to rebuild site / Rebuild Signaller (push) Successful in 22s
Details

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
BOTAlex 2026-05-22 14:30:19 +02:00
parent f2a88ea986
commit 3e5780337e
1 changed files with 92 additions and 84 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

176
src/routes/school/css/+page.svelte
View file

@ -189,7 +189,9 @@
<input type="checkbox" checked={true} />
<!-- Accordion Header Title -->
<div class="collapse-title text-4xl font-medium">Full Network Overview</div>
<div class="collapse-title text-4xl text-center font-medium">
Full Network Overview
</div>
<!-- Accordion Body Content -->
<div class="collapse-content">
@ -270,7 +272,7 @@
<input type="checkbox" checked={true} />
<!-- Accordion Header Title -->
<div class="collapse-title text-4xl font-medium">
<div class="collapse-title text-4xl text-center font-medium">
Explore Country Level Relationships
</div>
@ -422,95 +424,101 @@
<input type="checkbox" checked={true} />
<!-- Accordion Header Title -->
<div class="collapse-title text-4xl font-medium">Main findings</div>
<div class="collapse-title text-4xl text-center font-medium">
Main findings
</div>
<!-- Accordion Body Content -->
<div class="collapse-content">
<div class="flex gap-4">
<section class="flex-2/3 flex flex-col gap-2">
<div>
Our analysis suggests that diplomatic attention in UN speeches is
unevenly distributed across countries. A smaller number of countries
appear much more frequently in international discourse, while many
others are mentioned less often. In the network, countries such as
the United States, China, and Russia stand out as especially visible
actors, which suggests that global political attention is
concentrated around a limited set of highly prominent states.
</div>
<div>
The country level graphs also show that diplomatic attention is
directional rather than balanced. Some countries appear to direct
attention broadly toward many others, while some are more prominent
as targets of discussion. For example, the United States appears as
a country with broad outgoing attention, while China and Russia also
emerge as major targets of incoming attention from other countries.
This shows that centrality in the network can reflect different
roles: a country may be highly active in talking about others,
highly visible as a topic of discussion, or both.
</div>
<div>
Another important pattern is that international political discourse
is not purely positive or purely negative. The sentiment based
graphs suggest that the same country can receive both supportive and
critical references depending on who is speaking and in what
context. This is especially visible for countries like the United
States, China, and Russia, which appear in a mix of positive and
negative relationships rather than fitting into a single simple
category. This highlights the complexity of diplomatic language,
where cooperation, criticism, and strategic concern can exist at the
same time.
</div>
<div class="py-2"></div>
<div>
The filtered graphs also make it easier to compare large, globally
central actors with smaller or more selective ones. For example, the
Vatican appears much less densely connected than countries such as
the United States, China, or Russia. This suggests a more selective
pattern of diplomatic attention, where some actors are present in
the network but do not occupy the same broad, central role as major
geopolitical powers.
</div>
<div>
Taken together, these findings suggest that UN speeches reveal more
than isolated political statements. They reflect a larger structure
of global diplomatic attention in which a small number of countries
occupy especially central positions, while others appear in more
limited or specialized ways. By combining mention frequency with
positive and negative framing, the network provides a more nuanced
picture of how countries are represented in international discourse.
</div>
</section>
<div class="justify-center flex">
<div class="flex gap-4 max-w-7xl">
<section class="flex-2/3 flex flex-col gap-2">
<div>
Our analysis suggests that diplomatic attention in UN speeches is
unevenly distributed across countries. A smaller number of
countries appear much more frequently in international discourse,
while many others are mentioned less often. In the network,
countries such as the United States, China, and Russia stand out
as especially visible actors, which suggests that global political
attention is concentrated around a limited set of highly prominent
states.
</div>
<div>
The country level graphs also show that diplomatic attention is
directional rather than balanced. Some countries appear to direct
attention broadly toward many others, while some are more
prominent as targets of discussion. For example, the United States
appears as a country with broad outgoing attention, while China
and Russia also emerge as major targets of incoming attention from
other countries. This shows that centrality in the network can
reflect different roles: a country may be highly active in talking
about others, highly visible as a topic of discussion, or both.
</div>
<div>
Another important pattern is that international political
discourse is not purely positive or purely negative. The sentiment
based graphs suggest that the same country can receive both
supportive and critical references depending on who is speaking
and in what context. This is especially visible for countries like
the United States, China, and Russia, which appear in a mix of
positive and negative relationships rather than fitting into a
single simple category. This highlights the complexity of
diplomatic language, where cooperation, criticism, and strategic
concern can exist at the same time.
</div>
<div class="py-2"></div>
<div>
The filtered graphs also make it easier to compare large, globally
central actors with smaller or more selective ones. For example,
the Vatican appears much less densely connected than countries
such as the United States, China, or Russia. This suggests a more
selective pattern of diplomatic attention, where some actors are
present in the network but do not occupy the same broad, central
role as major geopolitical powers.
</div>
<div>
Taken together, these findings suggest that UN speeches reveal
more than isolated political statements. They reflect a larger
structure of global diplomatic attention in which a small number
of countries occupy especially central positions, while others
appear in more limited or specialized ways. By combining mention
frequency with positive and negative framing, the network provides
a more nuanced picture of how countries are represented in
international discourse.
</div>
</section>
<div class="lg:w-1/3 flex flex-col gap-4 max-h-screen min-h-0">
<div class="font-semibold text-2xl shrink-0">
Example of China’s outgoing vs incoming diplomatic attention
</div>
<div
class="badge bagde-xl badge-primary font-semibold text-primary-content"
>
Interactive
</div>
<div
class="flex flex-1 flex-col lg:flex-row gap-4 min-h-0 overflow-hidden"
>
<iframe
src="https://deprived.dev/assets/school/social-science/data/interactive/CHN-in.html"
style="border: none; background: transparent;"
allowtransparency={true}
title="Network Graph Incoming"
class="w-full h-[400px] block"
<div class="lg:w-1/3 flex flex-col gap-4 max-h-screen min-h-0">
<div class="font-semibold text-2xl shrink-0">
Example of China’s outgoing vs incoming diplomatic attention
</div>
<div
class="badge bagde-xl badge-primary font-semibold text-primary-content"
>
</iframe>
Interactive
</div>
<iframe
src="https://deprived.dev/assets/school/social-science/data/interactive/CHN-out.html"
style="border: none; background: transparent;"
allowtransparency={true}
title="Network Graph Outgoing"
class="w-full h-[400px] block"
<div
class="flex flex-1 flex-col lg:flex-row gap-4 min-h-0 overflow-hidden"
>
</iframe>
<iframe
src="https://deprived.dev/assets/school/social-science/data/interactive/CHN-in.html"
style="border: none; background: transparent;"
allowtransparency={true}
title="Network Graph Incoming"
class="w-full h-[400px] block"
>
</iframe>
<iframe
src="https://deprived.dev/assets/school/social-science/data/interactive/CHN-out.html"
style="border: none; background: transparent;"
allowtransparency={true}
title="Network Graph Outgoing"
class="w-full h-[400px] block"
>
</iframe>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>